Any comments longer than my original blog post will probably get removed as fatuous waffle. Especially if they are of the "I'm impotent (crushed balls innit) so could you shag my girlfriend so I can watch type that some idiot psts"
what are you on about i made no possessive claims sex is purely a matter between myself and one woman and only for the duration of the act. As to passion I only have sex with those robust enough that control is unnecesary.
Why you have to attach so much claptrap to a simple act of pleasure indicates to me you are wasting intellectual effort on the least intellectual activity the human animal undertakes - try thinking about something useful rather than your rutting needs eg any of Hilbert's problems still outstanding or those with inelegant solutions.
Five years later- still waiting for Crushed to turn the other cheek. Hypocrite!
NObody cares about your [lack of ] sex life Crushed and more than we want to have your views of free love inflicted upon us from someone who can't get ONE girl.
Baht At- In spite of your unpleasant nature, one wouldehave thought YOU at least had the intelligence to get the point.
I was asked of late by a friend how I manage to be so NICE all the time.
I said 'Easy. I just imagine that I've basically had my personality completely replaced by a programme which COMPELS me to speak to everyone at all times as if they are a customer and my job is simply to please them'.
I act at all times as if I'm programmed to simply PLEASE whoever's company I'm in at any time, as if I'm a ROBOT WHO HAS BEEN PROGRAMMED TO BE NICE but has no feelings of my own because I'm a robot.
My life philosophy is based on teaching everyone to do this all the time.
Crushed can you please stick to the rules - no comments longer than the blog post you are commenting on.
Addressing your point I think your imaginary friend actually asked how you were so creepy all the. Time, anyway even if I'm wrong about the only real people I can think of who are always nice to people are used car salesmen. Their justification is to distract your attention from the dog of a car they are trying to con you into buying. Yours is exactly the same.
You also need to grow up and stop treating a blog as something of importance it isn't only people are important - anything they leave behind whether it is the form of shit, vomit, a novel or even (shock!) A beautifully crafted blog are nothing (except to a dung beatle that loves shit .... actually most blog-readers are the 'net equivalent of dung beatles). Anyone unable to accept that what they produce is shit in one form or another is mentally ill and should preferably commit honourable suicide or at the very least seek proper medical treatment.
It's the sole purpose of life to leave something behind to live in in the collective. Life HAS no other purpose, except reproduction.
My justification for being always nice is quite simple. If everyone else did the same, human beings would never come into conflict and therefore never experience the sort of emotions that make Ubermouth such an unpleasant human being.
You say only people are important. I agree- collectively.
Individuuals aren't. And when they are unprepared to accept the social contract, if they can't be cured of their confrontational behavior, then we shouldn't be afraid to mark their genes for deletion.
This default nice ... that sounds an awful lot like rape to me, do you seek people's consent before imposing yourself upon them? No you don't you barge in without taking the temperature thinking that your "nice" is something people will value and that it entitles you to engage them in your barmy pseudo-philisophical claptrap. Look at your posts here - all they do is address your interests rather than provide comment on my interests. The way blogging is supposed to work is you express your views on your blog and on other people's blogs you confine yourself to commenting on their interests rather than promoting your own cult.
The fact you stamp around imposing yourself on people by being nice without reason to do so merely reflects your need for attention what makes you so special that you can demand the right to be nice to others - I for one don't want the obligation to return the social niceties unless I have given some indication of my willingness to do so.
Reproduction isn't a purpose it is merely what life does without thought and certainly without direction. A purpose is something done with intent like snaring women with slimey niceness so they can then be mentally abused.
As to social contract people have to show themselves worthy of my attention before any such obligations arise and you waste too much of my time and effort with your tedious repetitive and humourless views. If just once you could express yourself briefly I might threat you with less than the contempt the ideas expressed in your blog deserves.
No, you have a moral duty to God to be nice. It isn't something you have a moral choice about, Baht At.
It isn't an optional, it's a moral obligation.
you say people are what matters. I agree.
My life principles are these; I serve as a priest or a social worker to all mankind, but clearly there are those I call friends for whom I have a personal preference.
Nevertheless, my duty to God means I must also put my personal preferences aside and love all human beings equally.
It is my moral duty- as it is yours- to treat all human beings AS IF you are in love with them- yes, I said IN LOVE with them- whether you are or not.
Because it is your duty to love all human beings equally and without personal preference.
As in- you need to learn to love your God and then you realise that all human beings are mere shadows of the Univeral Force of Love that powers the universe.
And as such, it is your duty to serve that. To treat all human beings as if God entrusted you to be their shepherd.
Guide the sheep, Baht At. That is the task of Real Men.
OK idiots - take a timeout, if you want to spout this nonsense about each other keep it to your own blogs.
As for you crushed - real men eat sheep only wet fucking shepherds guide them and then only if they have a dog to do the job for them. You want to be a feeble-minded tender of sheep just go ahead but don't encourage others to waste their time
You had me at 'fatuous waffle' haha!
ReplyDeleteto a T?
ReplyDeleteIt's nothing to with impotence, you Neanderthal.
ReplyDeleteIt's about mastering your negative emotions so you can learn to be passive :)
Or did you not read the bit where Christ taught 'Turn the other cheek'?
It's about learning not to see someone as your property and being prepared to love the man who pleasures your women in spite of you :)
Which is the bit a pseudo man like you who can't control his passions would never see.
what are you on about i made no possessive claims sex is purely a matter between myself and one woman and only for the duration of the act. As to passion I only have sex with those robust enough that control is unnecesary.
ReplyDeleteWhy you have to attach so much claptrap to a simple act of pleasure indicates to me you are wasting intellectual effort on the least intellectual activity the human animal undertakes - try thinking about something useful rather than your rutting needs eg any of Hilbert's problems still outstanding or those with inelegant solutions.
Five years later- still waiting for Crushed to turn the other cheek. Hypocrite!
ReplyDeleteNObody cares about your [lack of ] sex life Crushed and more than we want to have your views of free love inflicted upon us from someone who can't get ONE girl.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteBaht At- In spite of your unpleasant nature, one wouldehave thought YOU at least had the intelligence to get the point.
ReplyDeleteI was asked of late by a friend how I manage to be so NICE all the time.
I said 'Easy. I just imagine that I've basically had my personality completely replaced by a programme which COMPELS me to speak to everyone at all times as if they are a customer and my job is simply to please them'.
I act at all times as if I'm programmed to simply PLEASE whoever's company I'm in at any time, as if I'm a ROBOT WHO HAS BEEN PROGRAMMED TO BE NICE but has no feelings of my own because I'm a robot.
My life philosophy is based on teaching everyone to do this all the time.
Crushed can you please stick to the rules - no comments longer than the blog post you are commenting on.
ReplyDeleteAddressing your point I think your imaginary friend actually asked how you were so creepy all the. Time, anyway even if I'm wrong about the only real people I can think of who are always nice to people are used car salesmen. Their justification is to distract your attention from the dog of a car they are trying to con you into buying. Yours is exactly the same.
You also need to grow up and stop treating a blog as something of importance it isn't only people are important - anything they leave behind whether it is the form of shit, vomit, a novel or even (shock!) A beautifully crafted blog are nothing (except to a dung beatle that loves shit .... actually most blog-readers are the 'net equivalent of dung beatles). Anyone unable to accept that what they produce is shit in one form or another is mentally ill and should preferably commit honourable suicide or at the very least seek proper medical treatment.
Wrong, Baht At.
ReplyDeleteIt's the sole purpose of life to leave something behind to live in in the collective. Life HAS no other purpose, except reproduction.
My justification for being always nice is quite simple. If everyone else did the same, human beings would never come into conflict and therefore never experience the sort of emotions that make Ubermouth such an unpleasant human being.
You say only people are important. I agree- collectively.
Individuuals aren't. And when they are unprepared to accept the social contract, if they can't be cured of their confrontational behavior, then we shouldn't be afraid to mark their genes for deletion.
This default nice ... that sounds an awful lot like rape to me, do you seek people's consent before imposing yourself upon them? No you don't you barge in without taking the temperature thinking that your "nice" is something people will value and that it entitles you to engage them in your barmy pseudo-philisophical claptrap. Look at your posts here - all they do is address your interests rather than provide comment on my interests. The way blogging is supposed to work is you express your views on your blog and on other people's blogs you confine yourself to commenting on their interests rather than promoting your own cult.
ReplyDeleteThe fact you stamp around imposing yourself on people by being nice without reason to do so merely reflects your need for attention what makes you so special that you can demand the right to be nice to others - I for one don't want the obligation to return the social niceties unless I have given some indication of my willingness to do so.
Reproduction isn't a purpose it is merely what life does without thought and certainly without direction. A purpose is something done with intent like snaring women with slimey niceness so they can then be mentally abused.
As to social contract people have to show themselves worthy of my attention before any such obligations arise and you waste too much of my time and effort with your tedious repetitive and humourless views. If just once you could express yourself briefly I might threat you with less than the contempt the ideas expressed in your blog deserves.
'nice without reason to do so'
ReplyDeleteNo, you have a moral duty to God to be nice. It isn't something you have a moral choice about, Baht At.
It isn't an optional, it's a moral obligation.
you say people are what matters. I agree.
My life principles are these; I serve as a priest or a social worker to all mankind, but clearly there are those I call friends for whom I have a personal preference.
Nevertheless, my duty to God means I must also put my personal preferences aside and love all human beings equally.
It is my moral duty- as it is yours- to treat all human beings AS IF you are in love with them- yes, I said IN LOVE with them- whether you are or not.
Because it is your duty to love all human beings equally and without personal preference.
As in- you need to learn to love your God and then you realise that all human beings are mere shadows of the Univeral Force of Love that powers the universe.
ReplyDeleteAnd as such, it is your duty to serve that. To treat all human beings as if God entrusted you to be their shepherd.
Guide the sheep, Baht At. That is the task of Real Men.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteOK idiots - take a timeout, if you want to spout this nonsense about each other keep it to your own blogs.
ReplyDeleteAs for you crushed - real men eat sheep only wet fucking shepherds guide them and then only if they have a dog to do the job for them. You want to be a feeble-minded tender of sheep just go ahead but don't encourage others to waste their time
Thanks Baht At[but don't lump me in his category].
ReplyDeleteBaht At,
ReplyDeleteYour last remark simply proves one thing;
You are a very EVIL man.
I pray to god for your soul.
Well, you're safe now Baht At. :)
ReplyDeleteGod ALWAYS answers the prayers of psychopaths.
He wouldn't dare not.